|
|
| Author |
Message |
standarizeMA
Joined: 09 Mar 2008 Posts: 123
|
Posted: Thu Aug 21, 2008 11:34 pm Post subject: WBr Furystoke |
|
|
So I'm sure you've seen the other post..big local tournament this Saturday and I'm probably going to play this..it's tested very, VERY well against the tier 1. Um, if it turns out better than I expect i'll take it to SCG $5k in Boxborough. Critique / thoughts / critism.
// Deck file for Magic Workstation (http://www.magicworkstation.com)
// Lands
4 [EVE] Rugged Prairie
4 [EVE] Fetid Heath
4 [SHM] Reflecting Pool
2 [LRW] Vivid Meadow
2 [LRW] Vivid Marsh
1 [LRW] Vivid Crag
1 [CHK] Mountain (4)
3 [7E] Plains (4)
2 [IN] Swamp (3)
2 [LRW] Ancient Amphitheater
// Creatures
4 [SHM] Kitchen Finks
4 [SHM] Murderous Redcap
4 [LRW] Marsh Flitter
3 [SHM] Furystoke Giant
4 [LRW] Cloudgoat Ranger
// Spells
4 [MOR] Bitterblossom
4 [SHM] Spectral Procession
2 [SHM] Torrent of Souls
2 [EVE] Rise of the Hobgoblins
4 [LRW] Nameless Inversion
// Sideboard
SB: 3 [LRW] Wispmare
SB: 2 [LRW] Shriekmaw
SB: 4 [LRW] Burrenton Forge-Tender
SB: 3 [LRW] Moonglove Extract
SB: 3 [MOR] Spitebellows |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Aditeojr
Joined: 07 Nov 2004 Posts: 30
|
Posted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 4:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
| maybe u want to include brion stoutarm, and husk....u already support white, so briond could fling husk to dome, and gaining life in the process. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
thedarkness
Joined: 13 Jul 2006 Posts: 493
|
Posted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 5:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Husk isn't in block, so why would he want either of those? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
thranarama
Joined: 23 Apr 2005 Posts: 191
|
Posted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 9:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I actually think that the deck looks really interesting (having been beaten by you playing it on MWS). Most of my criticisms have to do w/ your sideboard choices. Extract seems a bit irrelevant in the sideboard, since the main thing you want to use it on is forge-tender, and you already have Inversions and Shriekmaws post-board. I'd like to see Cribswap instead of Bellows because it can get rid of colossus in response to an activation and can also remove Oversoul of Dusk. My assumption here is that Bellows is mainly for the Doran matchup. My only other real question I guess is how is your Faeries matchup? Extract could become Thoughtseizes since you have no other real disruption. Anyway, those are just my critiques, good luck w/ the deck! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ChuckNorris
Joined: 13 Dec 2005 Posts: 109
|
Posted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Extract is in there for Stillmoon Cavalier obv. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
thranarama
Joined: 23 Apr 2005 Posts: 191
|
Posted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Ah. That makes sense. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
standarizeMA
Joined: 09 Mar 2008 Posts: 123
|
Posted: Fri Aug 22, 2008 11:22 am Post subject: ya |
|
|
| Extract is for stillmoon cavalier. lol and along with the sideboard I understand what you mean. But I think I'm switching the 4 main deck inversions to maybe 3 crib swaps and something else because of Colossus lol.. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ggerg
Joined: 04 Sep 2005 Posts: 487
|
Posted: Sat Aug 23, 2008 2:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
er, isn't having approximately 5 million blockers good enough against colossus?
i'd rather see you playing thoughtseize over extract, as seize is just as much an answer to cavaliers, plus it's....good in other situations as well (as in ALL of them)
this looks nice tho. i think i saw a guy loose when playing for the top 8 last round of a ptq last week. he played windbrisk heights tho, and i didn't see furystoke.
i think heights would be a great addition. i'm not a very big fan of torrent of souls in any deck, but it does at least seem decent here, and it definitely gets better if you include heights |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tms-Rock
Joined: 02 Apr 2008 Posts: 32
|
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 10:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah i've been a variation of WBr stoke Tokins all week testing for the ptq this is the build i've been running w/
4 Furystoke
4 Cloudgoat
3 Shriekmaw
4 Kitchen Finks
4 Marsh Flitter
2 Torrent of souls
4 Nameless
4 Spectral Procession
4 Bitterblossoms
1 Cribswap
1 Cenn's Enlistment
4 Windbrisk heights
4 Fetid Heath
3 Vivid Marsh
1 Vivid Meadow
4 Ancient Ampathetere
2 Rugged Piare
2 Plains
1 Swamp
4 Reflecting pool
sb:
3 thoughtseize
2 Cribswap
4 Burrenton Forge-Tender
1 Shriekmaw
3 Runed Halo
1 Puppeteer Clique
1 Raven's Crime
Boards a bit random atm cuz i've just been trying things out
TBH the deck really hasn't had a bad match-up yet, the best thing is it beats fairys pretty much every time i've tested Post board so far 6-1, and 4-1 kithkin post board. Really TBH RDW probably the hardest if they get the nuts other than that it seems like its worth its wild to play it, so stable.
Runed Halo Deffenitly the most helpful board card, Collesseus/Demigod Crib swap comes in on RDW/Doran match-ups and QnT if its playing COlleses sometimes either way. Puppeteer clique has been redicolously good the few times i've boarded it in vs Doran and QnT, Torrent for it is quiet nice. Kyle Sanchez just top 8'd last weekend w/ this list.
creature [19]
4 Cloudgoat Ranger
4 Fulminator Mage
3 Furystoke Giant
4 Kitchen Finks
3 Marsh Flitter
1 Shriekmaw
instant [4]
4 Makeshift Mannequin
sorcery [8]
4 Spectral Procession
4 Torrent of Souls
enchantment [4]
4 Bitterblossom
land [25]
4 Fetid Heath
2 Plains
4 Reflecting Pool
3 Rugged Prairie
2 Twilight Mire
4 Vivid Marsh
3 Vivid Meadow
3 Windbrisk Heights
60 cards
Sideboard:
3 Cloudthresher
3 Shriekmaw
1 Primal Command
4 Thoughtseize
4 Runed Halo
15 cards
seems interesting mannequin would be pretty sweet, fulimantor in the main deffenitly seems interesting  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tms-Rock
Joined: 02 Apr 2008 Posts: 32
|
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 10:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah i've been a variation of WBr stoke Tokins all week testing for the ptq this is the build i've been running w/
4 Furystoke
4 Cloudgoat
3 Shriekmaw
4 Kitchen Finks
4 Marsh Flitter
2 Torrent of souls
4 Nameless
4 Spectral Procession
4 Bitterblossoms
1 Cribswap
1 Cenn's Enlistment
4 Windbrisk heights
4 Fetid Heath
3 Vivid Marsh
1 Vivid Meadow
4 Ancient Ampathetere
2 Rugged Piare
2 Plains
1 Swamp
4 Reflecting pool
sb:
3 thoughtseize
2 Cribswap
4 Burrenton Forge-Tender
1 Shriekmaw
3 Runed Halo
1 Puppeteer Clique
1 Raven's Crime
Boards a bit random atm cuz i've just been trying things out
TBH the deck really hasn't had a bad match-up yet, the best thing is it beats fairys pretty much every time i've tested Post board so far 6-1, and 4-1 kithkin post board. Really TBH RDW probably the hardest if they get the nuts other than that it seems like its worth its wild to play it, so stable.
Runed Halo Deffenitly the most helpful board card, Collesseus/Demigod Crib swap comes in on RDW/Doran match-ups and QnT if its playing COlleses sometimes either way. Puppeteer clique has been redicolously good the few times i've boarded it in vs Doran and QnT, Torrent for it is quiet nice. Kyle Sanchez just top 8'd last weekend w/ this list.
creature [19]
4 Cloudgoat Ranger
4 Fulminator Mage
3 Furystoke Giant
4 Kitchen Finks
3 Marsh Flitter
1 Shriekmaw
instant [4]
4 Makeshift Mannequin
sorcery [8]
4 Spectral Procession
4 Torrent of Souls
enchantment [4]
4 Bitterblossom
land [25]
4 Fetid Heath
2 Plains
4 Reflecting Pool
3 Rugged Prairie
2 Twilight Mire
4 Vivid Marsh
3 Vivid Meadow
3 Windbrisk Heights
60 cards
Sideboard:
3 Cloudthresher
3 Shriekmaw
1 Primal Command
4 Thoughtseize
4 Runed Halo
15 cards
seems interesting mannequin would be pretty sweet, fulimantor in the main deffenitly seems interesting  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Slin
Joined: 28 Jan 2006 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 2:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Ajani Goldmane is nuts in this deck. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ggerg
Joined: 04 Sep 2005 Posts: 487
|
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 10:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
i've decided i dont like this deck. sure it can be good, but a good player can play around/to defeat most cards in here.
to note: i think cenns enlistment is a fine addition to a couple different strategies in block |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tms-Rock
Joined: 02 Apr 2008 Posts: 32
|
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 10:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Idk maybe its your build, i've been testing a ton and the decks redicolously consistant and has extremely stable and reliable match-ups against jsut about everything. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|