|
|
| Author |
Message |
isperia
Joined: 05 Feb 2008 Posts: 14
|
Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 3:54 am Post subject: Mono green aggro |
|
|
Well i c M-L is full of monodecks, so i propose the following one:
// Lands
10 [SHM] Forest (1)
4 [MOR] Mutavault
2 [TSB] Pendelhaven
4 [10E] Treetop Village
4 [FUT] Horizon Canopy
// Creatures
4 [LRW] Cloudthresher
4 [SHM] Oversoul of Dusk
4 [MOR] Chameleon Colossus
4 [SHM] Devoted Druid
4 [FUT] Magus of the Vineyard
4 [EVG] Llanowar Elves
4 [LRW] Garruk Wildspeaker
4 [CS] Ohran Viper
// Spells
4 [10E] Loxodon Warhammer
// Sideboard
SB: 2 [SHM] Grim Poppet
SB: 2 [TSP] Squall Line
SB: 4 [10E] Razormane Masticore
SB: 3 [SHM] Kitchen Finks
SB: 4 [FUT] Riftsweeper
how dy think about it? its some modification from PTQ Tokyo 1st place (+4 viper -4 dryads +some changed sb)
i guess i need some good sb, what cards do u think fit this deck? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ACM
Joined: 03 Jan 2008 Posts: 122
|
Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 9:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
Nothing beats Troll Ascetic  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tinman
Joined: 05 Nov 2005 Posts: 182 Location: Winter par
|
Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 12:24 pm Post subject: replys |
|
|
| well you asked so... that magus needs to be birds if you ask me giving your opponet 2 green is trouble if you ask me. Way to many number symbols in mana costs. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Vedrfolner
Joined: 04 Apr 2006 Posts: 1443
|
Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 12:53 pm Post subject: Re: replys |
|
|
| tinman wrote: | | well you asked so... that magus needs to be birds if you ask me giving your opponet 2 green is trouble if you ask me. Way to many number symbols in mana costs. |
On the other hand, dropping a Chameleon Colossus turn 2 can be quite amazing...
I feel he needs more stuff to do with the mana, though. More instants. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rdeg87
Joined: 29 Apr 2007 Posts: 200
|
Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 2:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Magus is great. Giving GG to Fae players is a nightmare for them and as said before turn 2 Collosus or turn 3 Oversoul is just sick. If giving your opponent 2G is an issue then side it out.
You dont need instants as you'll be spending your mana on Warhammers.
I dont know about swapping out the Dryads. You'll have to test with and without them to find if they are needed or not. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jdf121
Joined: 21 May 2005 Posts: 196
|
Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 3:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Since when is oversoul, thresher, and colossus aggro?? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
rdeg87
Joined: 29 Apr 2007 Posts: 200
|
Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 3:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| When you play them on turns 2,3 and 4 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Thorns
Joined: 16 Aug 2006 Posts: 862 Location: Rath
|
Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 5:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| jdf121 wrote: | | Since when is oversoul, thresher, and colossus aggro?? |
Ever since something called beatdown. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Acid_Christ
Joined: 28 Aug 2004 Posts: 568
|
Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 7:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I was expecting to see Vanquishers along side of Nettle Sentinel and Snakeform.
Seems more like a mono green mana ramp that throws out big stuff and says "deal with it". |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wisdomhappy
Joined: 24 Oct 2007 Posts: 16
|
Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 10:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| As a BG control player, I encourage all of you to play this deck. Im sure you can get around 2/5ths of the colors playing wrath of god |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wisdomhappy
Joined: 24 Oct 2007 Posts: 16
|
Posted: Mon Aug 25, 2008 10:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| on secibd thought this deck is pretty good against most stuff, would still honestly hope to play against it with BG control tho. sudden spoiling, slaughter pact, damnation and shreikmaw is more than your serious threats. even with oversoul, I bet you could support at least 1-2 more lands that dont produce green, maybe add one mouth/snow or one springjack pasture for warrhammer/gurriks ovverun synergy. just seems like even if you were not able to cast a turn 3-5 oversoul, you would still be able to get the ggggg before you lose much tempo, or at LEAST with even 6 lands that don't produce green, would you really run out of things to play before you got 5 mana? possibly, but I would at LEAST seriouslt advise playing 2 forests that are snow-covered or somethhing, so you can see how ofteb playing 6 nongreens would screw you. to be honst, with devoted druid and gurrik it is possible you could even support 7 if you are lucky. I dont play the deck so I dont know at all like you do. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Enyeez
Joined: 18 Nov 2004 Posts: 81
|
Posted: Tue Aug 26, 2008 12:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
you lose to,
Merfolk, Elves, Llark is unwinable.
Red if you dont play pariah, if you do, you cant lose it.
faeries comes down to the draw, but you should be favourable.
the deck is not that strong, I played a similar one at the Copenhagen GP. 2-3 drop. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|