|
|
| Author |
Message |
pmoore311
Joined: 19 Feb 2007 Posts: 64
|
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 6:35 am Post subject: RG Warriors |
|
|
Have had some success with this deck lately nothing new but I have made several tweeks to the main deck from some previous RG Warriors decks in the past. I personally just like playing RG decks and although it may not be as good as Mono R, Faeries, & QnT this deck does have a fighting chance against the strongest decks in the format. One of the biggest all-stars in the deck has been the suprisingly pesky Nettle Sentinel. Anyways here is the list. Comments are welcomed.
Creatures//
4 Boggart Ram-Gang
4 Bramblewood Paragon
4 Chameleon Colossus
4 Imperous Perfect
4 Nettle Sentinal
4 Wrens Run Vanquisher
1 Nacatl War-Pride
Spells//
4 Flame Javelin
2 Giant Baiting (The deck has enough creatures that many times this is played with conspire. With Bramblewood in play look out.)
4 Incinerate
1 Firespout
Land//
6 Mountain
5 Forest
4 Fire-Lit Thicket
4 Karplusan Forest
4 Treetop Village
1 Pendelhaven
S.B.//
3 Firespout - for obvious reasons
3 Dead/Gone - Chameleon Colossus (Elves, Merfolk), Figure of Destiny (Mono Red)
3 Raking Canop - Demigod (Mono Red)
3 Finks - Mono Red
3 Krosan Grip - Utility
As you can see in my local meta, Mono Red is the by far the most popular deck so I have tailored my S.B. accordingly.
Last edited by pmoore311 on Tue Sep 02, 2008 7:27 am; edited 2 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Poofter
Joined: 28 May 2007 Posts: 27
|
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 7:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Decks looks like its ok the only thing i don't really like is the giant baiting i can see where 2 5/5 trample haste dudes can be good but i don't think that card is a good of 4 of. I think you should maybe cut 2 of them and maybe 1 flame javelin and maybe run 3 Obsidian battle-axe that card is baller once it hits. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Circa
Joined: 26 Dec 2005 Posts: 228
|
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 8:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
Bramblewood Paragon?
That is a really good Warrior for a "RG Warrior" deck..
People miss him a lot, but he is nutz. Trample wins. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pmoore311
Joined: 19 Feb 2007 Posts: 64
|
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 9:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Poofter wrote: | | Decks looks like its ok the only thing i don't really like is the giant baiting i can see where 2 5/5 trample haste dudes can be good but i don't think that card is a good of 4 of. I think you should maybe cut 2 of them and maybe 1 flame javelin and maybe run 3 Obsidian battle-axe that card is baller once it hits. |
Battle-Axe is great but most of the time is a little slow, especially since this deck is without llanowar elves for a possible T2 Battle-Axe.
Perhaps 4 Giantbaiting is too many, it hasn't hurt me yet. I would be open for suggestions as to what I could possibly add if I took out 2 Giantbaiting's. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tinman
Joined: 05 Nov 2005 Posts: 182 Location: Winter par
|
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 10:22 am Post subject: replys |
|
|
-2 giant baiting +2 anything late game bruiser, any avatar in green or red, 2 disentegrates, 2 garruk for overrun possibilities, those are the ones that immediatly come to mind for me im quite sure there are plenty others,
you could add + 2 harmonize for some late game refill
i would say confine your search to 2 cards that would help in the late game against decks you are dropping to 6 or less
but cant quite seem to get the rest of the way against.
In finishing its your meta you find em.
later info super highways
tinman |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
[R]Nchamay
Joined: 17 Jul 2008 Posts: 44
|
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 1:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| What about that nactl war dude. basically wins if u have other stuff out |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
pmoore311
Joined: 19 Feb 2007 Posts: 64
|
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 1:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| [RAWR]TSexy wrote: | | What about that nactl war dude. basically wins if u have other stuff out |
Not a bad idea. If he resolves and gets to attack...GG. I may test this card. Thanks for the idea. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tird_Ape
Joined: 09 Dec 2006 Posts: 111
|
Posted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 2:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ive always tried to make a good r/g warriors deck the problem is it just doesn't work, it loses to all of the tier one decks and dies to any wrath/removal. Still if you insist on playing it have you considered talara's battlion? seems good |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|