Magic-League.com Forum Index Magic-League.com
Forums of Magic-League: Free Online Magic: the Gathering Play with Apprentice and Magic Workstation; casual or tournament play.
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

RDW Shaman



 
Reply to topic    Magic-League.com Forum Index -> Lorwyn Block Constructed (LBC)
Author Message
Invader



Joined: 26 Dec 2007
Posts: 18

PostPosted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 1:55 pm    Post subject: RDW Shaman Reply with quote

What would u side out against Kithkin with this deck:

http://www.deckcheck.net/deck.php?id=18614

and what side in?

For what is Spiteful Visions?

Thx for the answers, and pls think before u talk girls and boys Wink
Back to top
R3wind



Joined: 24 Jul 2006
Posts: 972

PostPosted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 4:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Spiteful Visions is any deck that play a Mulldrifter or Mind Spring.
Back to top
onecleanceli



Joined: 27 Mar 2005
Posts: 264

PostPosted: Fri Aug 08, 2008 4:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

R3wind wrote:
Spiteful Visions is any deck that play a Mulldrifter or Mind Spring.


i.e. mannequin/QnT/commands type decks, plus it helps fuel your hand while still helping you race them faster
Back to top
Vedrfolner



Joined: 04 Apr 2006
Posts: 1443

PostPosted: Sat Aug 09, 2008 5:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Against Kithkin: Moonglove Extract and Ember Gale. If you expect lots of Kithkin in your area, you might want to run Glarewielder in side as well. Also, where is Stigma Lasher??? Much better than Flame Jab/Gouger in the side. I think the pump effect of Incandescent Soulstoke is much more important than the size of Thunderblust in a deck like this. I have a Elemental Shaman deck which I have polished since Rage Forger came out, so I know what I am talking about.
Back to top
svenihilator



Joined: 01 May 2008
Posts: 7

PostPosted: Sat Aug 09, 2008 6:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Isn't Puncture blast almost strictly better than moonglove extract in this list? Also, Vexing shusher is poop, Stigma Lasher is just better. The deck needs some more reach aswell, maybe try unwilling recruit, i've had a ridiculous amiunt of succes with that card. Or even sunflare shaman.

This format isn't fast and infact has many ways to deal with quick decks. Most of the decks out there have conformed with this knowledge in mind to more midrangish decks. This deck will win some fights, but not many. I believe it needs to be more midrangish to be a real competitor.

This is my personal list:

// Lands
4 [SHM] Graven Cairns
9 [CHK] Mountain (1)
4 [LRW] Auntie's Hovel
4 [MOR] Mutavault
3 [CHK] Swamp (3)

// Creatures
4 [LRW] Flamekin Harbinger
4 [MOR] Rage Forger
4 [EVE] Stigma Lasher
3 [LRW] Incandescent Soulstoke
4 [MOR] Sunflare Shaman
1 [MOR] Lightning Crafter
3 [EVE] Thunderblust
3 [SHM] Intimidator Initiate

// Spells
3 [LRW] Profane Command
4 [LRW] Lash Out
3 [LRW] Thoughtseize

// Sideboard
SB: 2 [EVE] Unwilling Recruit
SB: 4 [EVG] Tarfire
SB: 4 [SHM] Flame Javelin
SB: 3 [SHM] Ember Gale

Note that the sideboard of more burn is because of my faerie heavy meta.

The maindeck is capable of beating any deck out there right now. Not to mention the emphasis on beating certain decks in the sidebord. The only deck I really have trouble with is the green white little kid deck with oversouls, finks, primal commands and colossi, but i can usually set up a lethal alpha strike with a profane set on fear and damage, or fear and resurecting a rage forger.
Back to top
seizureboi



Joined: 15 Jan 2008
Posts: 3

PostPosted: Sat Aug 09, 2008 12:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

svenihilator wrote:
Isn't Puncture blast almost strictly better than moonglove extract in this list? Also, Vexing shusher is poop, Stigma Lasher is just better. The deck needs some more reach aswell, maybe try unwilling recruit, i've had a ridiculous amiunt of succes with that card. Or even sunflare shaman.

This format isn't fast and infact has many ways to deal with quick decks. Most of the decks out there have conformed with this knowledge in mind to more midrangish decks. This deck will win some fights, but not many. I believe it needs to be more midrangish to be a real competitor.

This is my personal list:

// Lands
4 [SHM] Graven Cairns
9 [CHK] Mountain (1)
4 [LRW] Auntie's Hovel
4 [MOR] Mutavault
3 [CHK] Swamp (3)

// Creatures
4 [LRW] Flamekin Harbinger
4 [MOR] Rage Forger
4 [EVE] Stigma Lasher
3 [LRW] Incandescent Soulstoke
4 [MOR] Sunflare Shaman
1 [MOR] Lightning Crafter
3 [EVE] Thunderblust
3 [SHM] Intimidator Initiate

// Spells
3 [LRW] Profane Command
4 [LRW] Lash Out
3 [LRW] Thoughtseize

// Sideboard
SB: 2 [EVE] Unwilling Recruit
SB: 4 [EVG] Tarfire
SB: 4 [SHM] Flame Javelin
SB: 3 [SHM] Ember Gale

Note that the sideboard of more burn is because of my faerie heavy meta.

The maindeck is capable of beating any deck out there right now. Not to mention the emphasis on beating certain decks in the sidebord. The only deck I really have trouble with is the green white little kid deck with oversouls, finks, primal commands and colossi, but i can usually set up a lethal alpha strike with a profane set on fear and damage, or fear and resurecting a rage forger.

Why do you have auntie's hovel and not primal beyond?
Back to top
svenihilator



Joined: 01 May 2008
Posts: 7

PostPosted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 2:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

So that i can play thoughtseize on turn one. Plus it would make my profanes that much worse and my lash outs couldnt be shot out on turn two at a smokebraider or the likes. And lastly, the entire reason for hovel is more black and it would, in fact, never be able to produce black on what i need black for. Some chance is better than no chance.
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    Magic-League.com Forum Index -> Lorwyn Block Constructed (LBC) All times are GMT - 7 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Magic: the Gathering Cards

All content on this page may not be reproduced without consent of Magic-League Directors.
Magic the Gathering is TM and copyright Wizards of the Coast, Inc, a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc. All rights reserved.


About Us | Contact Us | Privacy Policy